Home
Understanding Business Accounting For Dummies - UK, 4th UK Edition
Explore Book
Buy On Amazon

Two methods are available to prepare a statement of cash flows: the indirect and direct methods. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) prefers the direct method, while many businesses prefer the indirect method. Regardless of which method you use, the bottom-line cash balance is the same, and it has to equal the amount of cash you show on the balance sheet.

The last step in compiling the statement of cash flows is to verify that the ending balance in the cash flow statement equals the ending balance in the cash account on the balance sheet. If they don’t agree, there must be a mistake or missing cash transactions in the cash flow statement. This is the process used for both the direct and indirect method.

The following figures show you what the statement of cash flows looks like when you use both the direct and indirect methods of preparation. The following figure is the statement of cash flows using the direct method.

image0.jpg

The next figure is the statement of cash flows using the indirect method. As you look at both, note that the cash balance on 12/31/2015 is the same for both methods.

image1.jpg

Using the direct method

The direct method of preparing the statement of cash flows shows the net cash from operating activities. This section shows all operating cash receipts and payments. Some examples of cash receipts you use for the direct method are cash collected from customers, as well as interest and dividends the company receives. Examples of cash payments are cash paid to employees and other suppliers and interest paid on notes payable or other loans.

Here are three key facts to remember about the direct method:

  • You present cash received and paid — not net income or loss as shown on the income statement.

  • Any differences between the direct versus the indirect method are located in the operating section of the statement of cash flows. The financing and investing sections are the same regardless of which method you use.

  • The FASB prefers the direct method because it believes the direct method gives the users of the financial statements a more complete picture of the health of the business.

Starting indirectly with net income

When you use the indirect method of preparing the statement of cash flows, the operating section starts with net income from the income statement. You then adjust net income for any noncash items hitting the income statement. One typical adjustment is for depreciation, which is a noncash transaction.

Other common items requiring adjustment are gains and losses from the sale of assets. This is because the gains or losses shown on the income statement for the sale will rarely if ever equal the cash a company receives.

In other words, gain or loss is based on the difference between the asset’s net book value, which is cost less accumulated depreciation, and the amount the item sold for — not how much cash the buyer hands over to the seller.

Assume a business has a machine it no longer uses. Because it no longer needs the machine, the business sells it to another company for $1,500. The cash received is $1,500, but what about gain or loss on disposal? Consider these facts:

  • The company originally paid $3,000 to purchase and install the machine.

  • The asset was depreciated, meaning that the asset’s cost was gradually posted to depreciation expense over the machine’s useful life. The total amount depreciated over time (accumulated depreciation) was $2,000.

  • Book value for the machine on the date of sale was $1,000 ($3,000 cost – $2,000 accumulated depreciation).

  • The company debits (increases) cash for $1,500 and debits (reduces) accumulated depreciation for $2,000. When the asset is sold, the accumulated depreciation account is adjusted to zero. Debits total $3,500.

  • The asset is credited (reduced) by $3,000, which is the original cost.

  • Gain on disposal is a credit for $500, which is the difference between $3,500 total debit and the $3,000 credit. After the gain is posted, total debits and credits both equal $3,500.

You see that the cash received ($1,500) differs from the gain on disposal ($500). These are the types of transactions that are reconciled in the statement of cash flows. The net income change ($500 gain) doesn’t match the $1,500 cash inflow.

About This Article

This article is from the book: 

No items found.

About the book author:

Kenneth W. Boyd has 30 years of experience in accounting and financial services. He is a four-time Dummies book author, a blogger, and a video host on accounting and finance topics.

Lita Epstein, who earned her MBA from Emory University's Goizueta Business School, enjoys helping people develop good financial, investing, and tax planning skills. She designs and teaches online courses and has written more than 20 books, including Bookkeeping For Dummies and Reading Financial Reports For Dummies, both published by Wiley.

Mark P. Holtzman, PhD, CPA, is Chair of the Department of Accounting and Taxation at Seton Hall University. He has taught accounting at the college level for 17 years and runs the Accountinator website at www.accountinator.com, which gives practical accounting advice to entrepreneurs.

Frimette Kass-Shraibman is Associate Professor of Accounting at Brooklyn College — CUNY.

Vijay S. Sampath is Managing Director in the Forensic and Litigation Consulting business segment of FTI Consulting, Inc.

John A. Tracy is Professor of Accounting at the University of Colorado in Boulder and the author of Accounting For Dummies.

Tage C. Tracy is principal owner of TMK & Associates, an accounting, financial,and strategic business planning consulting firm.

John A. Tracy is Professor of Accounting at the University of Colorado in Boulder and the author of Accounting For Dummies.

Jill Gilbert Welytok, JD, CPA, LLM, practices in the areas of corporate law, nonprofit law, and intellectual property. She is the founder of Absolute Technology Law Group, LLC (www.abtechlaw.com). She went to law school at DePaul University in Chicago, where she was on the Law Review, and picked up a Masters Degree in Computer Science from Marquette University in Wisconsin where she now lives. Ms. Welytok also has an LLM in Taxation from DePaul. She was formerly a tax consultant with the predecessor firm to Ernst & Young. She frequently speaks on nonprofit, corporate governance–taxation issues and will probably come to speak to your company or organization if you invite her. You may e-mail her with questions you have about Sarbanes-Oxley at [email protected].